Sublattice symmetry

We just saw that time-reversal symmetry can forbid the topological invariant to take a certain set of values. We now study another case where a symmetry changes the topological properties dramatically.

Let’s now take a system where we can split all the degrees of freedom into two groups (say group AA and group BB) such that the Hamiltonian only has nonzero matrix elements between two groups, and not inside each group. This situation arises naturally when the lattice has two sublattices, as in the hexagonal carbon lattice of graphene. So let’s imagine our quantum dot is now a graphene dot:

Sublattice Symmetry CC BY TU Delft CC SA

As a consequence of sublattice symmetry, the Hamiltonian of the graphene dot looks like this:

Sublattice Symmetry CC BY TU Delft CC SA

We can once again generate a random Hamiltonian with sublattice symmetry, here:

Sublattice Symmetry CC BY TU Delft CC SA

If we introduce a diagonal matrix σzσz that equals +1+1 for sites on sublattice AA, and 1−1 for sites on sublattice BB, we can write the sublattice symmetry of the Hamiltonian as

σzHσz=H.σzHσz=−H.

This immediately means that if (ψA,ψB)T(ψA,ψB)T is an eigenvector of the Hamiltonian with energy εε, then (ψA,ψB)T(ψA,−ψB)T is an eigenvector with energy ε−ε. A symmetric spectrum is the consequence of sublattice symmetry.

What does this mean for the topological classification? Clearly, the number of states with negative energy is the same as the number of states with positive energy, and that means we don’t ever expect a single level to cross zero energy.

Let’s once again see if this is correct by transforming a random Hamiltonian with sublattice symmetry into another one.

Sublattice Symmetry CC BY TU Delft CC SA

Indeed, we can deform all the Hamiltonians with sublattice symmetry into one another without closing the gap. This means that an extra symmetry may render topological classification trivial.

Question

OK, let’s see what we have so far. Which symmetry certainly does not restrict the values that the topological invariant can take.

  1. Spinless time-reversal symmetry
  2. Sublattice symmetry
  3. Conservation law
  4. Spinful time-reversal symmetry

 Answer:

Spinless time-reversal symmetry

We cannot be sure about the conservation law, since the blocks may have different remaining symmetries. And we just saw that sublattice symmetry makes every system trivial, while spinful time-reversal makes the numbers of levels even.

Read more
Back to top