Important announcement

Dear visitor,

Please note that this OpenCourseWare platform will be replaced at the end of 2026 by a new platform (under the same url ocw.tudelft.nl).

Courses and their contents that are currently available the platform will partly be migrated. URL’s for this content will change and content might be unavailable for some time. In addition, some courses will not be available anymore.

If you are linking to specific courses on this platform (for instance for your students), please take timely measures to avoid problems with access. Possible actions are:

  • Download the materials to your local platform (laptop, server)
  • For educators only (including TU Delft lecturers): Contact us at ocw@tudelft.nl and inform us what course you are using in what context (institute, program, period of use, number of students). We will research (in collaboration with the authors of the course) and decide if we will migrate the course, and if yes, can supply you with a new url.

Thank you.

3.7.3 The calibration score of the DM (2)

Course subject(s) Module 3. Performance-based weights and the Decision Maker

Let’s consider another example!

Intelligence and other life aspects

Three experts have been consulted to provide their opinions with respect to the correlation between intelligence in primary school children and other personality traits and success in several aspects of life.

A sample from 10 primary schools was taken in order to obtain realizations, and based on these, the experts can be evaluated in terms of both a calibration and an information score.

“Road to Success – Success – Winning” by ota_photos is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

In order to simplify the example, only experts’ quantiles will be presented below.

Five questions were asked, for which the experts provided their assesments, which are provided below.

Question Realization Expert A

5%  50%  95%

Expert B

5%  50%  95%

Expert C

5%  50%  95%

1 24 2   5   7 20  23  34 20  25  28
2 11 12  13  15 8  10  11 10  13  15
3 68 87  89  92 60  70  90 65  67  70
4 47 2   5  8 20  35  45 42  44  46
5 31 48  50  52 30  35  40 32  33  35

Again, these assessments are fictional. Real examples would imply more questions, and the calculations by hand would be much harder!

These assessments lead to the following calibration and information scores (up to the third decimal).

You can check the scores if you want!

Calibration score Information score
Expert A 3.621E-005 1.418
Expert B 0.608 0.558
Expert C 0.327 1.354

Note that the calibration score of Expert A is very small, that is 0.00003621!

These scores lead to the following performance-based weights:

0.00006565341 (Expert A), 0.4338007 (Expert B) and 0.5661336 (Expert C).

In turn, the performance-based weights lead to the following assessments for the Performance-based Decision Maker (PWDM) and the Equal Weight Decision Maker (EWDM).

Question Realization Expert A

5% 50% 95%

Expert B

5% 50% 95%

Expert C

5% 50% 95%

PWDM

5% 50% 95%

EWDM

5% 50% 95%

1 24 2   5   7 20  23  34 20  25  28 19.97  24.48  33.11 2.55  21.77  32.39
2 11 12  13  15 8  10  11 10  13  15 8.19  10.91  14.86 8.31  12.23  14.91
3 68 87  89  92 60  70  90 65  67  70 60.75  67.56  87.94 61.43  71.08  91.61
4 47 2   5  8 20  35  45 42  44  46 21.02  42.8  45.97 2.55  34.28  45.78
5 31 48  50  52 30  35  40 32  33  35 30.29  33.47  39.82 30.66  35.34  51.63
Creative Commons License
Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Introduction to Structured Expert Judgment by TU Delft OpenCourseWare is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://online-learning.tudelft.nl/courses/decision-making-under-uncertainty-introduction-to-structured-expert-judgment//.
Back to top
[sg_popup id=6]