3.7.3 The calibration score of the DM (2)
Course subject(s)
Module 3. Performance-based weights and the Decision Maker
Let’s consider another example!
Intelligence and other life aspects
Three experts have been consulted to provide their opinions with respect to the correlation between intelligence in primary school children and other personality traits and success in several aspects of life.
A sample from 10 primary schools was taken in order to obtain realizations, and based on these, the experts can be evaluated in terms of both a calibration and an information score.
“Road to Success – Success – Winning” by ota_photos is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0
In order to simplify the example, only experts’ quantiles will be presented below.
Five questions were asked, for which the experts provided their assesments, which are provided below.
Question | Realization | Expert A
5% 50% 95% |
Expert B
5% 50% 95% |
Expert C
5% 50% 95% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 24 | 2 5 7 | 20 23 34 | 20 25 28 |
2 | 11 | 12 13 15 | 8 10 11 | 10 13 15 |
3 | 68 | 87 89 92 | 60 70 90 | 65 67 70 |
4 | 47 | 2 5 8 | 20 35 45 | 42 44 46 |
5 | 31 | 48 50 52 | 30 35 40 | 32 33 35 |
Again, these assessments are fictional. Real examples would imply more questions, and the calculations by hand would be much harder!
These assessments lead to the following calibration and information scores (up to the third decimal).
You can check the scores if you want!
Calibration score | Information score | |
---|---|---|
Expert A | 3.621E-005 | 1.418 |
Expert B | 0.608 | 0.558 |
Expert C | 0.327 | 1.354 |
Note that the calibration score of Expert A is very small, that is 0.00003621!
These scores lead to the following performance-based weights:
0.00006565341 (Expert A), 0.4338007 (Expert B) and 0.5661336 (Expert C).
In turn, the performance-based weights lead to the following assessments for the Performance-based Decision Maker (PWDM) and the Equal Weight Decision Maker (EWDM).
Question | Realization | Expert A
5% 50% 95% |
Expert B
5% 50% 95% |
Expert C
5% 50% 95% |
PWDM
5% 50% 95% |
EWDM
5% 50% 95% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 24 | 2 5 7 | 20 23 34 | 20 25 28 | 19.97 24.48 33.11 | 2.55 21.77 32.39 |
2 | 11 | 12 13 15 | 8 10 11 | 10 13 15 | 8.19 10.91 14.86 | 8.31 12.23 14.91 |
3 | 68 | 87 89 92 | 60 70 90 | 65 67 70 | 60.75 67.56 87.94 | 61.43 71.08 91.61 |
4 | 47 | 2 5 8 | 20 35 45 | 42 44 46 | 21.02 42.8 45.97 | 2.55 34.28 45.78 |
5 | 31 | 48 50 52 | 30 35 40 | 32 33 35 | 30.29 33.47 39.82 | 30.66 35.34 51.63 |
Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Introduction to Structured Expert Judgment by TU Delft OpenCourseWare is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://online-learning.tudelft.nl/courses/decision-making-under-uncertainty-introduction-to-structured-expert-judgment//.